Current:Home > BackTrump moves to dismiss federal election interference case-InfoLens
Trump moves to dismiss federal election interference case
View Date:2024-12-23 16:17:30
Former President Donald Trump made his first motion to dismiss his federal election interference case Thursday, citing what his lawyers claim is his "absolute immunity" from prosecution for actions taken while serving in the nation's highest office.
"Breaking 234 years of precedent, the incumbent administration has charged President Trump for acts that lie not just within the 'outer perimeter,' but at the heart of his official responsibilities as President," Trump's attorneys say in their filing. "In doing so, the prosecution does not, and cannot, argue that President Trump's efforts to ensure election integrity, and to advocate for the same, were outside the scope of his duties."
The filing is the first in a series of anticipated motions to dismiss the case against Trump brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith that charged him with four counts related to his alleged plot to overturn the 2020 election.
MORE: Special counsel raises more concerns over Trump's attacks on witnesses
Trump in August pleaded not guilty to charges of undertaking a "criminal scheme" to overturn the results of the 2020 election by enlisting a slate of so-called "fake electors," using the Justice Department to conduct "sham election crime investigations," trying to enlist the vice president to "alter the election results," and promoting false claims of a stolen election as the Jan. 6 riot raged -- all in an effort to subvert democracy and remain in power.
The former president has denied all wrongdoing and denounced the charges as "a persecution of a political opponent."
While Smith's indictment specifically alleged Trump clearly acted outside the scope of his office while engaging in an unlawful conspiracy to obstruct the peaceful transfer of power, Trump's attorneys on Thursday contended that Smith "falsely claims President Trump's motives were impure" and that he "knew" reports of fraud in the election were untrue.
"...[As] the Constitution, the Supreme Court, and hundreds of years of history and tradition all make clear, the President's motivations are not for the prosecution or this Court to decide," they argue. "Rather, where, as here, the President's actions are within the ambit of his office, he is absolutely immune from prosecution."
MORE: Trump opposes special counsel's request for gag order in Jan. 6 case
Trump's attorneys hinge at least part of their argument of Trump's immunity on his acquittal by the Senate following his impeachment in the wake of the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol.
"The Impeachment Clauses provide that the President may be charged by indictment only in cases where the President has been impeached and convicted by trial in the Senate," they say. "Here, President Trump was acquitted by the Senate for the same course of conduct... The Special Counsel cannot second-guess the judgment of the duly elected United States Senate."
And rather than take the position that the actions taken by Trump leading up to the Jan. 6 attack fell within the "outer perimeter" of his duties -- including his pressure campaign against state officials to overturn his election losses, his alleged efforts to recruit the Justice Department to falsely declare the election was rife with fraud, and his push for then-Vice President Mike Pence to reject electors -- they instead make the case that such acts fell at the "heart of his constitutional duties" to ensure the election was conducted with integrity.
Judge Tanya Chutkan will likely order a briefing schedule laying out deadlines for the government to issue its response to the motion to dismiss.
veryGood! (6692)
Related
- Suicides in the US military increased in 2023, continuing a long-term trend
- 14 sex buyers arrested, 10 victims recovered in human trafficking sting at Comic-Con
- Drag queen in Olympic opening ceremony has no regrets, calls it ‘a photograph of France in 2024’
- Pucker Up, Lipstick Addicts! These 40% Off Deals Are Selling Out Fast: Fenty Beauty, Too Faced & More
- Elon Musk says 'SNL' is 'so mad' Trump won as he slams Dana Carvey's impression
- Court reverses conviction against former NH police chief accused of misconduct in phone call
- Cardi B files for divorce from Offset, posts she’s pregnant with their third child on Instagram
- Sea lions are stranding themselves on California’s coast with signs of poisoning by harmful algae
- The Best Gifts for People Who Don’t Want Anything
- Can dogs eat grapes? Know which human foods are safe, toxic for your furry friends.
Ranking
- Jordan Chiles Reveals She Still Has Bronze Medal in Emotional Update After 2024 Olympics Controversy
- How high can Simone Biles jump? The answer may surprise you
- Powerball winning numbers for July 31 drawing: Jackpot at $171 million
- A woman is arrested in vandalism at museum officials’ homes during pro-Palestinian protests
- About Charles Hanover
- ACLU sues Washington state city over its anti-homeless laws after a landmark Supreme Court ruling
- As a historic prisoner exchange unfolds, a look back at other famous East-West swaps
- Teen brother of Air Force airman who was killed by Florida deputy is shot to death near Atlanta
Recommendation
-
Stock market today: Asian stocks decline as China stimulus plan disappoints markets
-
Gabby Thomas was a late bloomer. Now, she's favored to win gold in 200m sprint at Olympics
-
Who Is Rebeca Andrade? Meet Simone Biles’ Biggest Competition in Gymnastics
-
Honolulu Police Department releases body camera footage in only a fraction of deadly encounters
-
US inflation may have picked up in October after months of easing
-
Who will host 'Pop Culture Jeopardy!' spinoff? The answer is...
-
Gabby Thomas was a late bloomer. Now, she's favored to win gold in 200m sprint at Olympics
-
Pregnant Cardi B Puts Baby Bump on Display in New York After Filing for Divorce From Offset